对中国38个城市医生为期3天戒烟培训课程的评价
2012/07/05
摘要
背景:世界卫生组织“烟草控制框架公约”于2006年在中国实施。自此,采取了一系列的烟草控制措施,包括在中国医院建立戒烟门诊的协调网络。一般情况下,采用印制的资料对戒烟专业人员进行培训。本研究在中国评价2个为期3天的集中戒烟培训课程的效果,该课程与为英国专家戒烟服务提供培训的专家进行协作。
方法:参与中国20个省和4个自治区(共38个城市)戒烟治疗的84名医生参与此项培训课程。在认证培训前后,对参与者戒烟知识的了解和自我效能进行评价。
结果:培训能显著改善这些医生对戒烟知识的了解、戒烟的技能和自我效能。48名医生最终被认定为“戒烟专家”。
结论:面对面培训的英国模式用于戒烟培训,在中国是可以接受的,也是有效的。相对简短的培训项目能显著改善戒烟的技能和戒烟知识的了解,更好地参与到戒烟当中去。
(陈欣 审校)
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Apr;125(7):1338-40.
Evaluation of 3-day smoking cessation training course for doctors from 38 cities in China.
Zhang CM, Xiao D, West R, Michie S, Troughton R, Hajek P, Wang C.
Source
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization’s "Framework Convention on Tobacco Control" came into effect in China in 2006. Since then, a series of tobacco control measures has been undertaken, including the first step to establish a coordinated network of stop-smoking clinics in Chinese hospitals. Training for stop-smoking specialists has been traditionally provided via printed materials. This study evaluated the outcomes of the first two intensive 3-day courses in smoking cessation in China run in collaboration with experts who provide training to UK Specialist Stop Smoking Service.
METHODS: Eighty-four doctors from 38 cities in China responsible for stop-smoking treatment in 20 provinces and four autonomous regions participated in the training courses. Participants’ knowledge competencies and self-efficacy were assessed before and after the authentication training.
RESULTS: The training significantly improved participants’ knowledge, skills and self-efficacy across different domains. Forty-eight participants were finally certified as "smoking cessation specialist".
CONCLUSIONS: The UK model of face-to-face training was acceptable and effective in China. A relatively brief intensive training program can generate significant improvements in skills, knowledge, and readiness to engage in smoking cessation activities.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Apr;125(7):1338-40.
上一篇:
年轻人戒烟干预的作用:荟萃分析
下一篇:
经济刺激以促进戒烟