使用基于互联网的应急管理干预戒烟的可接受性：吸烟者、非吸烟者和医疗保健专业人员的意见
2013/07/29
摘要
基于互联网的应急管理（CM）干预对于吸烟的可接受性在两个试验中进行了评估。在试验1中，67例参与者（46％为女性）完成了一项基于互联网的CM干预，然后对干预相关的问题进行了回答。试验2 评估了对于从未使用过此干预的潜在治疗使用者对干预的接受程度（吸烟者，n=164，52％为女性）、非吸烟者（n=166，73％为女性）、卫生保健提供者（n=139，63％为女性）。试验2的参与者被随机分配到观看描述标准CM干预视频组（非定金组）或观看标准干预加定金激励视频组（定金组）。总体而言，这两个试验的结果显示干预在各个层面具有较高的可接受性。试验1中74％（治疗组参与者n =26）的参与者和试验2中92％（吸烟者中n =150）的参与者表示如果他们需要戒烟，他们会使用它。81％（n=113）的卫生保健提供者报告他们将很可能向患者推荐这项干预。参与两项试验的参与者报告监控他们的进度和获得优惠是干预的优势。无定金组对干预的优惠收益、现金收益、成本效益的评价高于定金组。医疗保健专业人员的评定没有因观看不同视频而不同。总体而言，研究结果表明，基于互联网的CM作为一种帮助人们戒烟的方法是可以被接受的。（心理学文摘资料数据库记录（c）2013 美国心理学会，保留所有权利）。
（林江涛 审校）
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Jun;21(3):204-13. doi: 10.1037/a0032451.
Acceptability of an internet-based contingency management intervention for smoking cessation: Views of smokers, nonsmokers, and healthcare professionals.
Raiff BR, Jarvis BP, Turturici M, Dallery J.
Abstract
The acceptability of an Internet-based contingency management (CM) intervention for cigarette smoking was evaluated in two experiments.In Experiment 1, 67 participants (46% female) completed an Internet-based CM intervention and then answered questions about the intervention. Experiment 2 assessed the acceptability of the intervention among potential treatment users who had never used the intervention, (smokers, n = 164, 52% female), nonsmokers (n = 166, 73% female), and health-care providers (n = 139, 63% female). Participants in Experiment 2 were randomly assigned to either watch a video describing the standard CM intervention (no-deposit group) or to watch a video about the standard intervention plus a deposit incentive (deposit group). Overall, results of both experiments indicated high acceptability across all dimensions of the intervention. In Experiment 1, 74% (n = 26 of participants in the treatment group) of participants said they would use it if they needed to quit, as well as 92% (n = 150 among smokers) of those in Experiment 2. Of the health-care providers, 81% (n = 113) reported that they would be very likely to recommend the intervention to patients. Participants in both experiments reported that monitoring their progress and earning vouchers were strengths of the intervention.The no-deposit group rated voucher earnings, cash earnings, and cost-effectiveness of the intervention higher than the deposit group. Health-care professionals did not differ in their ratings across video conditions. Overall, the results suggest that Internet-based CM is acceptable as a method to help people quit smoking. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Jun;21(3):204-13. doi: 10.1037/a0032451.
