首页 >  专业园地 >  文献导读 >  临床观察 > 正文

奥玛珠单抗在治疗难治性哮喘和重症哮喘中的现实效果:比利时的一项国家队列研究

2019/12/09

   摘要
   背景:指南推荐奥马珠单抗用于未控制的重症过敏性哮喘患者。我们调查了奥马珠单抗在现实世界中的使用情况、符合资格标准的患者比例、成本和有效性。
   方法:2010年至2016年之间在比利时接受奥马珠单抗治疗的哮喘患者队列中,我们调查研究了符合纳入标准的患者(长期使用大剂量吸入糖皮质激素(ICS)加上长效β2受体激动剂(LABA)和前一年严重的哮喘急性发作≥2次),比较了奥马珠单抗治疗1年前后的住院治疗情况和全身皮质类固醇激素使用情况。我们计算了各自时间段的医疗成本;并将符合纳入标准的患者和未符合纳入标准的患者每次预防住院治疗成本进行比较。
   结果:在2010年至2016年之间,共有2068名哮喘患者接受了奥马珠单抗治疗,仅仅只有24%的患者符合纳入标准,主要是由于使用高剂量ICS+LABA患者的依从性差。符合纳入标准的哮喘患者的住院率从41%下降到21%(绝对风险降低20%),而在未符合纳入标准的哮喘患者中住院率绝对风险降低5%(从19%到14%)。每次预防住院费用分别为€44 238和€139 495。35%的符合纳入标准的患者可以停止使用全身皮质类固醇激素,而未符合纳入标准的患者中,只有15%可以停止使用全身激素。
   结论:在比利时,奥马珠单抗主要应用于对ICS+LABA依从性差的未控制哮喘患者。奥马珠单抗可以降低住院次数和全身激素使用,但成本较高。在给予奥马珠单抗治疗之前,对难治性哮喘患者的精心管理应该是一个优先事项。


 
(中日友好医院呼吸与危重症医学科  张清  摘译  林江涛  审校)
(ERJ Open Res. 2019 Nov 25;5(4). pii: 00253-2018. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00253-2018.)



 
 
Real-life effectiveness of omalizumab in difficult-to-treat versus severe asthma: a national cohort study in Belgium.

 
Verhamme KMC, Lucet C, Van Meerhaeghe A, Brusselle GGO, Lambert ML.

 
Abstract

BACKGROUND:Guidelines recommend omalizumab in patients with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma. We investigated real-life use of omalizumab, the proportion of patients fulfilling eligibility criteria, its costs and its effectiveness.

METHOD:In a cohort of asthma patients initiating treatment with omalizumab in Belgium between 2010 and 2016, we investigated fulfilment of eligibility criteria (chronic use of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) plus long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) and ≥2 severe asthma exacerbations in previous year), and compared hospitalisations and systemic corticosteroid consumption in the year before and after omalizumab initiation. We computed healthcare costs in the respective time periods and compared the cost per prevented hospitalisation in patients fulfilling eligibility criteria versus those who did not.

RESULTS:Between 2010 and 2016, omalizumab treatment was initiated in 2068 patients with asthma; only 24% fulfilled the eligibility criteria, mainly due to nonadherence to high-dose ICSs + LABAs. The proportion of patients hospitalised for asthma decreased from 41% to 21% in eligible patients (absolute risk reduction, 20%), whereas the absolute risk reduction was 5% (from 19% to 14%) in noneligible patients. The cost per prevented hospitalisation was €44 238 versus €139 495, respectively. Chronic use of systemic corticosteroids was discontinued in 35% of eligible patients versus 15% of noneligible patients.

CONCLUSION:In Belgium, omalizumab is mostly initiated in uncontrolled asthma patients who are nonadherent to ICSs + LABAs. Omalizumab decreases hospitalisations and the use of systemic corticosteroids, but at a high cost. Careful management of patients with difficult-to-treat asthma should be a priority before prescribing omalizumab.

 


上一篇: 胃食管反流病与哮喘双向关联:利用一种国家样本队列进行的两项纵向随访研究
下一篇: 儿童、青少年和成人哮喘控制和严重程度的现实评估:与医疗机构和共患病的关系

用户登录