哮喘初次诊断后开展早期集中自我管理指导的10年随访结果
2011/11/23
摘要
目的:通过本次前瞻性随访研究,对哮喘患者自我管理指导的10年有效性进行分析,这些患者在哮喘治疗初期即采用激素吸入治疗。
方法:对连续就诊的新诊断为哮喘的患者进行随机分组(n=162):干预组(IG;n=80)和对照组(CG;n=82)。10年后检测患者的肺功能(LF)、气道高反应性(AHR)和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。
结果:肺功能指标为第一秒用力呼气体积(FEV1)和用力肺活量(FVC)。集中教育对肺功能的改善仅见于干预后的第一年。此后,两组之间在任何指标上未见显著差异。在为期10年的随访中,呼气峰值流量、AHR和HRQoL 在两组中均显著改善(两组在性别、吸烟和特应性上均无差异)。10年后,IG组68%的患者、CG组75%的患者在组胺刺激后仍表现为AHR。两组HRQoL 评分与普通人群的标准年龄组相似,但IG组50%患者、CG组55%的患者具有正常的哮喘特异性HRQoL评分。根据GINA 标准,IG组23%的患者、CG组25%的患者哮喘控制不佳。
结论:集中自我管理教育的疗效仅见于短期。本研究中,两组在任何指标上未见显著性差异,其肺功能和HRQoL接近正常。AHR仅部分改善,基于GINA标准,仅小部分患者哮喘控制较好。我们研究显示,采用肺功能单独评价哮喘不能真实反应哮喘治疗效果。HRQoL应该与GINA标准联合使用,对哮喘治疗转归进行评价。有关AHR在评价哮喘治疗中的作用及重要性尚不清楚。
(林江涛 审校)
J Asthma. 2011 Nov;48(9):945-51. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
Ten-year follow-up of early intensive self-management guidance in newly diagnosed patients with asthma.
Kauppinen RS, Vilkka V, Hedman J, Sintonen H.
Source
Department of Pulmonary Diseases, South Karelia Central Hospital , 53130 Lappeenranta , Finland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:We assessed the 10-year effectiveness of self-management guidance in a prospective follow-up study of patients with asthma when inhaled corticosteroids were used from the beginning in the treatment.
METHODS:Consecutive newly diagnosed asthmatics (n = 162) were randomized: 80 to an intervention group (IG) and 82 to a control group (CG). Lung function (LF), airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were examined at 10 years.
RESULTS:The advantages of intensive education with regards to LF measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity were seen only after the first year. Later, there were no statistically significant differences in any parameters between the groups. However, during 10-year follow-up, peak expiratory flow, AHR, and HRQoL improved significantly in both groups (no differences as regards gender, smoking, or atopy). At 10 years, 68% of the IG and 75% of the CG patients still showed AHR after histamine challenge. Generic HRQoL scores in both groups equaled that of the age-standardized group a general population but only 50% in the IG and 55% in the CG had normal disease-specific HRQoL scores. According to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria 23% of patients in the IG and 25% in the CG had asthma under control.
CONCLUSIONS:The effectiveness of intensive self-management education could be shown only in the short term. The groups did not differ significantly in any of the parameters investigated, and showed nearly normal LF and HRQoL. AHR improved only partly and only a minority of the patients had asthma under good control according to GINA criteria. This study showed that evaluation of asthma using LF alone does not show the whole truth about asthma treatment results. HRQoL should be used in conjunction with GINA criteria, to assess asthma treatment outcomes. The value and importance of AHR for the evaluation of treatment remains obscure.
J Asthma. 2011 Nov;48(9):945-51. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
上一篇:
哮喘处理项目对住院频率和急诊频率的影响
下一篇:
哮喘控制测试评分与FEV1及NO相关——希腊哮喘患者的治疗影响研究