首页 >  专业园地 >  文献导读 >  治疗 > 正文

基于嗜酸性粒细胞基线计数研究莫米松/茚达特罗/格隆溴铵对控制不足哮喘患者的疗效:IRIDIUM研究的事后分析

2023/10/25

   摘要
   背景:基线特征可能指导哮喘治疗。本研究评估了基线嗜酸性粒细胞水平可否影响莫米松/茚达特罗/格隆溴铵(MF/IND/GLY)治疗哮喘控制不足患者的疗效。
   方法:在这项IRIDIUM研究的事后分析中,比较不同基线外周血嗜酸性粒细胞计数亚组(<300个/μL和≥300个/μL)患者应用高剂量MF/IND/GLY(160/150/50μg,每日一次[o.d.])与高剂量MF/IND(320/150μg,每日一次)、高剂量氟替卡松/沙美特罗(FLU/SAL[500/50μg,每日两次[b.i.d.])的疗效。
   结果:本研究共纳入3065名患者。在第26周,高剂量MF/IND/GLY与高剂量MF/IND(Δ78mL[<300个/μL];Δ54mL[≥300个/μL])和FLU/SAL(Δ112mL[<300个/μL];Δ98mL[≥300个/μL])相比,谷FEV1有所改善。同样,与联用MF/IND相比,联用MF/IND/GLY也显示谷FEV1改善(Δ75mL[<300个/μL];Δ68mL[≥300个/μL])。在52周内,高剂量MF/IND/GLY与高剂量MF/IND相比,可使外周血嗜酸性粒细胞<300个/μL和≥300个/μL的亚组的中重度哮喘年发作率分别降低23%和10%,严重发作率分别降低31%和15%,全发作率分别降低33%和10%;而与FLU/SAL相比,分别降低了33%和41%、45%和42%、42%和39%。同样,与合联用MF/IND相比,联用MF/IND/GLY可使各亚组急性发作率分别降低22%和8%、21%和7%、27%和8%。
   结论:与MF/IND和FLU/SAL相比,MF/IND/GLY可改善肺功能并减少哮喘恶急性发作,且与基线嗜酸性粒细胞水平无关,表明嗜酸性粒细胞水平不影响MF/IND/GLY在哮喘控制不足患者中的疗效。
 
(中日友好医院呼吸与危重症医学科 张婧媛 摘译 林江涛 审校)
(Respir Med. 2023 Oct;217:107334. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107334.)

 
 
Efficacy of mometasone/indacaterol/glycopyrronium in patients with inadequately controlled asthma with respect to baseline eosinophil count: Post hoc analysis of IRIDIUM study.
 
Kostikas K, Maspero JF, Chapman KR, Mezzi K, Jaumont X, Lawrence D, van Zyl-Smit R.
 
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Baseline characteristics could potentially guide asthma treatments. We evaluated whether baseline eosinophil levels affect the efficacy of mometasone/indacaterol/glycopyrronium (MF/IND/GLY) in patients with inadequately controlled asthma.
METHODS:In this post hoc analysis of IRIDIUM study, efficacy of high-dose MF/IND/GLY (160/150/50 μg, once-daily [o.d.]) versus high-dose MF/IND (320/150 μg o.d.) and high-dose fluticasone/salmeterol (FLU/SAL [500/50 μg, twice-daily [b.i.d.]); and efficacy of pooled MF/IND/GLY (160/150/50 μg and 80/150/50 μg) versus pooled MF/IND (320/150 μg and 160/150 μg) was evaluated in patient subgroups with baseline blood eosinophil count of <300 cells/μL or ≥300 cells/μL.
RESULTS:Overall, 3065 patients were included. At Week 26, high-dose MF/IND/GLY showed improved trough FEV1 versus high-dose MF/IND (Δ78mL [<300 cells/μL]; Δ54mL [≥300 cells/μL]) and FLU/SAL (Δ112mL [<300 cells/μL]; Δ98mL [≥300 cells/μL]). Similarly, pooled MF/IND/GLY also showed improved trough FEV1 versus pooled MF/IND (Δ75mL [<300 cells/μL]; Δ68mL [≥300 cells/μL]). Over 52 weeks, high-dose MF/IND/GLY reduced the annualized rate of moderate or severe asthma exacerbations by 23% and 10%, severe exacerbations by 31% and 15%, and all exacerbation by 33% and 10% versus high-dose MF/IND for subgroups with <300 cells/μL and ≥300 cells/μL, respectively; and by 33% and 41%, 45% and 42%, 42% and 39% versus FLU/SAL, respectively. Similarly, pooled MF/IND/GLY reduced exacerbations by 22% and 8%, 21% and 7%, 27% and 8%, versus pooled MF/IND, for the respective subgroups.
CONCLUSION: MF/IND/GLY showed improvement in lung function and reduction in asthma exacerbations over MF/IND and FLU/SAL independent of baseline eosinophil levels, indicating that eosinophil levels did not affect the efficacy of MF/IND/GLY in patients with inadequately controlled asthma.
 



上一篇: Tezepelumab可降低气道上皮细胞IL-33和T2炎症,以应对哮喘患者的病毒刺激
下一篇: 墨旱莲甲醇提取物通过抑制NF-kappa-B途径降低慢性过敏性哮喘小鼠模型炎症

用户登录