首页 >  专业园地 >  文献导读 >  治疗 > 正文

应用ICS-福莫特罗或ICS-沙美特罗维持治疗的哮喘患者中按需福莫特罗的安全性和有效性

2023/04/21

   摘要
   背景:根据需要,建议哮喘患者使用低剂量吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)-福莫特罗缓解剂,维持ICS福莫特罗。临床医生经常询问ICS-福莫特罗缓解剂是否可以与其他维持性ICS长效β2-激动剂(LABA)一起使用。
   目的:评估RELEF研究中服用ICS-福莫特罗或ICS沙美特罗维持治疗患者所需福莫特罗的安全性和有效性。
   方法:RELIEF(SD-037-0699)是一项为期6个月的开放标签研究,将18124名哮喘患者随机分为4.5μg福莫特罗或200μg沙丁胺醇,再加上维持治疗。这项事后分析包括使用ICS福莫特罗或ICS沙美特罗维持治疗的患者(n=5436)。主要安全性结果是严重不良事件(SAE)和/或导致停药的不良事件(DAE)的复合结果;主要有效性结果是首次发作的时间。
   结果:对于两个维持组和两个缓解组,相似数量的患者具有≥1个SAE和/或DAE。在服用维持性ICS-沙美特罗而非ICS-福莫特罗的患者中,与需要的沙丁胺醇相比,需要的福莫特罗出现的非哮喘相关和非严重DAE明显更多(分别为p=0.0066和p=0.0034)。在服用ICS-福莫特罗维持治疗的患者中,与使用沙丁胺醇相比,使用所需福莫特罗的首次发作风险显著降低(HR 0.82;95%CI 0.70,0.95;p=0.007)。在服用ICS-沙美特罗维持治疗患者中,治疗组之间的首次发作时间没有显著差异(HR 0.95;95%CI 0.84,1.06;p=0.035)。
   结论:在ICS-福莫特罗维持治疗中,而非ICS-沙美特罗,按需福莫特罗比按需沙丁胺醇显著降低了哮喘发作风险。使用ICS-沙美特罗维持治疗加上按需福莫特罗,可以看到更多的DAE。需要进一步的研究来评估这是否与所需的ICS-福莫特罗组合有关。

 
(中日友好医院呼吸与危重症医学科 顾宪民 摘译 林江涛 审校)
(J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Apr 11;S2213-2198(23)00398-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.03.046.)

 
 
 
Safety and effectiveness of as-needed formoterol in asthma patients taking ICS-formoterol or ICS-salmeterol maintenance therapy
 
Helen K Reddel, Guy Brusselle, Rosa Lamarca, Per Gustafson, Gary P Anderson, Carin Jorup
 
Abstract
Background: As-needed low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-formoterol reliever is recommended in asthma patients prescribed maintenance ICS-formoterol. Clinicians often ask whether ICS-formoterol reliever can be used with other maintenance ICS-long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs).
Objective: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of as-needed formoterol in patients taking maintenance ICS-formoterol or ICS-salmeterol from the RELIEF study.
Methods: RELIEF (SD-037-0699) was a 6-month, open-label study that randomized 18,124 patients with asthma to as-needed formoterol 4.5μg or salbutamol 200μg on top of maintenance therapy. This post hoc analysis included patients on maintenance ICS-formoterol or ICS-salmeterol (n=5,436). The primary safety outcome was a composite of serious adverse events (SAEs) and/or adverse events leading to discontinuation (DAEs); the primary effectiveness outcome was time-to-first exacerbation.
Results: For both maintenance groups and both relievers, similar numbers of patients had ≥1 SAE and/or DAE. In patients taking maintenance ICS-salmeterol, but not ICS-formoterol, significantly more non-asthma-related and non-serious DAEs occurred with as-needed formoterol versus as-needed salbutamol (p=0.0066 and p=0.0034, respectively). In patients taking maintenance ICS-formoterol, there was a significantly lower risk in time-to-first exacerbation with as-needed formoterol versus as-needed salbutamol (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.70, 0.95; p=0.007). In patients taking ICS-salmeterol maintenance, time-to-first exacerbation was not significantly different between treatment arms (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.84, 1.06; p=0.35).
Conclusions: As-needed formoterol significantly reduced exacerbation risk compared with as-needed salbutamol when added to maintenance ICS-formoterol, but not to maintenance ICS-salmeterol. More DAEs were seen with ICS-salmeterol maintenance therapy plus as-needed formoterol. Further research is needed to assess whether this is relevant to as-needed combination ICS-formoterol.
 


上一篇: 地塞米松与甲基强的松龙治疗重症哮喘:一个单中心、开放标签、平行组的临床试验
下一篇: 度普利尤单抗在有或无过敏性哮喘证据的中度至重度2型哮喘儿童中的评估

用户登录